The exact short day
Simulation · No external actionsCash is checked day by day across thirteen weeks, not at week-ends, so a bill that lands two days before a receipt still shows. It names the first day under your floor and the lowest day.
Cash decision workspace for subcontractors
Ask about cash in plain words. Lakshyaa reads the spreadsheets you already keep, finds the exact day cash runs short, and lays out up to three different ways through, each with its evidence, a grade for how solid the ground is, and what it costs.
Where subcontractor cash actually goes wrong
Not one problem. The whole cash structure of a trade subcontractor: pay applications, retainage, certification, change orders, supplier terms, and the roll-up that hides the job in trouble.
It is not ordinary overdue AR and it is not forecastable cash, yet it sits in the same aging bucket as if it were.
You are financing the GC. Most owners have never framed it that way, and the books do not say so.
Work period, billing cutoff, submission, certification, and actual availability are separate events. Contract terms are not observed timing.
Project first, then roll up. A surplus on one job is only usable when it is truly uncommitted.
Real cost exposure today, no billable revenue, no forecastable cash, and no invented recovery probability.
Budgeted labor for the work performed against what it actually cost, on current-period evidence only, before the overrun becomes next month's cash gap.
Ways through
Not one lever at three sizes. Different approaches across the business, each with what it does to cash, what it costs, what it does to the contract, the work and the relationship. Fewer than three when fewer real approaches exist.
Moved only to a day you say that supplier agreed to, and it says it rests on your word.
Only against a line you have stated, and only up to what is left on it. Judged before it is offered.
Which invoices, collected by when, actually clear the short week, net of bills held until they are paid.
Ask about a purchase. It checks it against the weeks ahead, including financing on the terms you state.
A grade, never a score. Every option says how solid the ground is: what is read from your books, what rests on someone's word, and what is missing. When the grade is held down, it says why first. Never a percentage chance of being right.
What the workspace shows
Chat is the front door. Behind every answer sit the pages it was built from: cash position, decisions, projects, receivables, payables and your own figures, each one tracing to its rows.
Cash is checked day by day across thirteen weeks, not at week-ends, so a bill that lands two days before a receipt still shows. It names the first day under your floor and the lowest day.
Each way through says what it does to cash, what it costs, and where it stands with the contract, the work and the relationship. Where something is not in your records, it says "not known" instead of guessing.
Most tools will happily suggest paying a subcontractor late, because to a spreadsheet it is only a row with a date. Lakshyaa blocks it by rule, hands it to a person, and tells you it did. The options you are not shown are part of the answer.
A collection only helps if it lands by the first short day, and a bill held until that customer pays goes out with it. Every figure resolves to the workbook and row it came from; the language model is never allowed to write one.
It keeps score
A decision is not the end of it. You record what happened, and it holds its own forecast up against your bank.
Pick a way through. It is kept as a decision, with the evidence it stood on that day.
Did the customer pay early? Did the supplier wait? Tell it in chat; it says it back and saves only on yes.
The forecast is kept as it was, then compared week by week with the bank statements that come after.
"By Summit, do you mean Summit Builders?" It learns your shorthand and the pages you open, for your company only.
Learning is per company. Always. What it learns can order and frame what you see. It never changes a figure, a piece of evidence or a grade.
Integrations
Every source fills the same rows, and every row names the source that filled it. Read-only, every one: nothing writes back to your books.
Any layout, no template. Invoices, bills, bank downloads, job status and budgets. It asks about any column it cannot place.
A small connector on your PC reads your company file directly.
Receivables, payables, cash and job financials from your ledger.
Job cost, billing and payables from your construction accounting.
Projects, commitments and pay applications, so job cash lines up with the field.
Projects, budgets and cost from the field side of the job.
Share a sheet and it is read like an uploaded workbook.
The boundary
The line is fixed by design, not by a setting. Approval authority stays with the owner, and the workspace has no way to act on anything it shows.
The label sits on every product screen because it is true of every product screen. What you see is a simulation over your own evidence, and nothing on it can reach outside the workspace.
Private preview
We are working with a small number of subcontractors to shape what this decides. If cash timing is what keeps you up, we want to hear how you handle it now.